Thiamine is not the only vitamin of the B-group which has been tried in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) with promising results at pharmacological doses or doses much higher than RDA (recommended dietary allowance). In addition to thiamine, other examples include riboflavin (vitamin B2), niacin and nicotinamide riboside (vitamin B3) and cobalamin (vitamin B12). The relevant studies on vitamins other than B1 are presented here to show the role that vitamins B at high doses potentially play. These vitamins are being used as disease therapy interventions (therapeutics) and no longer just as supplements to replenish nutritional deficiencies. This has been defined as a “medical revolution in the medical field” (Lonsdale, 2021).
Adequate levels of all vitamins of the group-B vitamins are essential for optimal neurological functioning and cellular metabolism (Kennedy, 2016). However, most studies in PD have until recently focused on few vitamins B (namely, vitamins B6, B9 and B12) because of their role in homocysteine metabolism. An increasing number of observational studies have recently looked at the safety of some vitamins B taken alone or in combination (e.g. vitamins, B6, folic acid, B12). Once the impact of these individual vitamins on PwP’s quality of life and on PD progression has been ascertained and the safety of high doses given long-term has been determined, it is auspicable that research will address the safety and efficacy of these vitamins when they are administered in combination.
The results of a study on riboflavin in PD were published in 2003 (Coimbra, 2003). Of thirty-one (31) consecutive outpatients with PD who presented abnormal riboflavin status without dietary deficiency, nineteen (19) - 8 of whom males and 11 females - were given riboflavin orally (30 mg every 8 h) in addition to their current treatment.
Within a month, the riboflavin status of the patients was normalized. All the 19 patients who completed 6 months of treatment showed an improvement in motor capacity, ranging from 44 to 71%, based on Hoehn and Yahr’s scoring system.
The authors suggested that oral riboflavin, at those doses, caused clinical improvement. The study had some limitations, including the fact that the 12 patients who did not complete the 6-months therapy period were excluded from the analysis. Although the reasons are not given in the paper, it is possible that at least some of them dropped out because they could not tolerate the doses of riboflavin given.
Nonetheless, it was an interesting study, which used a B vitamin at high doses in PD. The vitamin B used, vitamin B2, has important functions. Riboflavin is an essential component of two major coenzymes, which play major roles in energy production and which are involved in niacin (Vitamin B3) and pyridoxine (Vitamin B6) metabolic pathways, including the activation of vitamin B6 (E.T. Marashly, 2017). Also, inadequate intake of riboflavin and pyridoxine may lead to niacin deficiency, as these vitamins are needed for the generation of niacin from tryptophan.
Riboflavin deficiency may reduce the metabolism of other B vitamins, namely folate and vitamin B6 (Powers, 2003).
Riboflavin is also involved in homocysteine metabolism, in which it plays an essential role interacting with other vitamins, namely vitamin B6, folate and vitamin B12 (Powers, 2003; Marashly, 2017). This is important, as homocysteine is toxic to brain cells.
It has been proposed that B2 might have neuroprotective mechanisms, due to its effects on oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuro-inflammation, and glutamate excitotoxicity (E.T. Marashly, 2017). These factors are currently believed to play a role in the pathogenesis of PD. This would make riboflavin a suitable, potential target for further research in PD.
Nicotinamide riboside (vitamin B3) Other researchers have looked at Nicotinamide riboside (NR), a form of vitamin B3, for its effects on increasing NAD (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide). NAD is essential for the production of energy by the mitochondria in cells. For their role in energy production, mitochondria have been defined the “power station” of the cell (Stott, 2018). They transform food nutrients into Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP). ATP represents “the fuel which cells run on.” (Stott, 2018). PwP have lower NAD levels than people who have no PD (C. Wakade, 2021) and this deficiency is expected to impact negatively on mitochondrial functions. In fact, Schöndorf and collaborators showed that increasing NAD levels by NR in patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells - differentiated into dopaminergic neurons - remarkably improved mitochondrial function (Schöndorf, 2018). The rationale of using NR in PD in a clinical trial is then that, if NR is able to increase intracellular NAD levels, it would correct the mitochondrial dysfunction linked to NAD-deficiency and thus improve cerebral metabolism (Schöndorf, 2018). A clinical trial had showed that in healthy adults chronic supplementation with NR was well tolerated and able to stimulate NAD metabolism (Martens, 2018).
The NADPARK study - a Phase 1, double-blinded clinical trial - was carried out to test the safety and efficacy of nicotinamide riboside in replenishing NAD in the brain in PwP (Brakedal, 2022).
Thirty (30) newly diagnosed PwP, who had not been started on any other medicine for PD, were given 1,000 mg nicotinamide riboside (NR) or placebo for 30 days. NR led to a significant - although variable - increase in cerebral NAD, decreased the levels of inflammatory cytokines in serum and cerebrospinal fluid, and was associated with mild clinical improvement.
NR was well tolerated during the duration of the study. The investigators concluded that this form of vitamin B3 may be neuroprotective in PD.
The same researchers have also started a larger study, the Phase 2 NOPARK randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial in 400 PwP at an early stage of the disease to assess the benefits of NR administered at the total dose of 1,000 mg for one year (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nicotinamide Supplementation in Early Parkinson's Disease (NOPARK). The study is due to be completed in March 2024.
To test the safety of a higher dose of NR (3,000 mg given for four weeks) in PwP, the investigators also conducted a double-blinded randomized safety study (NR-SAFE) in 20 PwP over 4 weeks, which showed “no moderate or severe adverse events, and no signs of acute toxicity”(*).In a previous RCT on the safety of nicotinamide riboside, overweight but otherwise healthy adults received doses of 100, 300 and 1000 mg of NR once a day for eight weeks. There was a significant increase in whole blood NAD within 2 weeks. The effect was dependent on the dose and was maintained for the rest of the study. The authors reported “no significant differences in adverse events between the nicotinamide riboside and placebo groups or between groups at different NR doses” (Conze, 2019).Another clinical trial on safety in which obese men were given a daily dose of 2 grams of NR for 12 weeks yielded similar results (Dollerup, 2018).
Finally, to establish the optimal dose of NR in PwP, a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial is currently underway, increasing doses from 1,000 to 3,000 mg in 12 weeks (N-DOSE: A Dose Optimization Trial of Nicotinamide Riboside in Parkinson's Disease).
In a study, researchers reported that high levels of NAD resulted in gliomas, which are brain tumour with a low survival rate in adults. This issue would need further investigation (Lucena-Cacace, 2017).
Niacin (Nicotinic acid)(Vitamin B3) A recent six-month, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial (RCT) was conducted to ascertain whether low-dose daily niacin supplementation (250 mg/day) would improve motor symptoms in PwP (Chong, 2021). Evidence suggests that neuro-inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction and activation of microglia in the brain may play an important role in the development and progression of PD. But why Niacin? Niacin (nicotinic acid and nicotinamide) is converted in the body into its main bioactive forms, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP). NAD and NADP are essential cofactors for cellular reactions to reduce oxidation and are vital for cellular metabolism. NAD is crucial for the production of energy in cells, by enhancing mitochondrial functions, and for normal functioning (Chong, 2021; Kirkland, 2018).
PwP have lower Vitamin B3 and NAD levels than people with no PD (C. Wakade, 2021). Also, levodopa depletes niacin levels in PwP by interfering with tryptophan breakdown. Thus niacin represents a good candidate to be tested as adjunctive treatment in PD to reduce neuro-inflammation and improve motor functions in PwP.
In the study, 47 PwP (32 men and 15 women) were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups: placebo, 100 mg of niacin or 250 mg of niacin, for 3 months.
Next, all of them received open-label niacin 250 mg. Those who were in the placebo and 100-mg groups changed to the 250-mg dose for 12 months, while those who were in the 250-mg group continued to take the same dose for another 9 months. The dose of 250 mg is over 15 times as high as the RDA. Niacin treatment was well-tolerated by forty-five out of 47 subjects, although 80% of the subjects in the 100-mg group experienced flushing.
At one year of niacin supplementation, typical PD motor symptoms (rigidity, bradykinesia) were reduced, postural stability improved, grip strength and handwriting size improved as did mood and fatigue, while serotonin levels and REM sleep percentage stabilized. The researchers concluded that treatment with daily niacin supplementation had the potential to improve quality of life in PD and slow disease progression.
It is important to note that “lower” vitamin B12 levels may still fall within the “normal” reference range for serum vitamin B12. Even patients with “normal” vitamin B12 levels falling in the low “normal” quartile have faster motor progression (Stuart, 2019) and those in the low B12 tertile have greater worsening of the ambulatory capacity (Christine 2020).
How common is vitamin B12 deficiency in PD? This information is important as vitamin B12 status is lower in PwP compared with controls (Sadasivan, 2012; Christine, 2018) and is common even in early PD (Stuart, 2019). PwP are more susceptible to having a vitamin B12 deficiency than persons without PD (Liang Shen, 2015). It has also been suggested that vitamin B12 needs in PD may be higher (Stuart, 2019). Furthermore, carbidopa/levodopa can reduce vitamin B12 levels, especially at high dosage (Qureshi, 2008) and can then be responsible for symptoms linked to vitamin B12 deficiency, including neuropathy (Toth, 2010).
Finally, symptoms which are present in persons with vitamin B12 deficiency, such as depression, paranoia, weakness, tiredness, muscular numbness, tingling and walking difficulties are symptoms observed also in PD.
Another important point is vitamin B12 contribution to reducing homocysteine levels. Vitamin B12 deficiency in PD is accompanied by higher serum levels of homocysteine. High levels of homocysteine are toxic to the brain and the cardiovascular system and might accelerate dopaminergic cell death through neurotoxic effects (Qureshi, 2008).
Low vitamin B12 and high homocysteine concentrations have been shown to be independently associated with dementia in PwP compared with non-demented PwP (Xie, 2017). PwP with moderately elevated total homocysteine have been found to have greater annualized declines in the Mini-Mental State Exam (Christine, 2020) – MMSE, a screening tool for Parkinson's disease dementia. Also, PwP treated with levodopa have significantly higher homocysteine levels compared with both controls and PwP not treated with levodopa. So, carbidopa/levodopa can reduce vitamin B12 levels and increase homocysteine levels.
As low B12 and elevated homocysteine can improve with vitamin supplementation, it would be relevant to see whether, through this, vitamin B12 improves motor and cognitive function in patients with PD (Stuart, 2019) and has an effect on PD progression (Christine, 2018).
A longitudinal study of 1,741 participants with early PD aimed at determining whether PD progression differed between PwP who took vitamin B12 supplementation compared to those who did not. Participants were grouped based on their daily use of supplements, namely no B12, multivitamin (MVI) (B12 < 100 μg) or multivitamin (MVI) + B12 (≥ 100 μg); and B12 only (≥ 100 μg)(Dietiker, 2019). At 3 years, although there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups, a trend was observed of a lower risk for the development of sensory symptoms (as a surrogate marker of neuropathy) in those taking MVI and MVI+B12 compared to those who took no supplement.
This background on vitamin B12 deficiency in PwP had brought a team of researchers to check B12 levels in samples originally taken from 680 PwP not receiving any other treatment for PD, including 456 follow-up samples (Christine, 2018). Thirteen percent (13%) of PwP tested had borderline low levels of vitamin B12, 7% had elevated homocysteine, while 2% had both. PwP who had lower levels of vitamin B12 at the start progressed faster and showed more walking and balance problems than those with higher levels. There was a significant association between high levels of homocysteine and faster cognitive decline. Low vitamin B12 and high homocysteine levels were therefore predictors of worse outcomes, in terms of mobility and cognitive decline, respectively. (Christine, 2018).
Safety Concerns While the preliminary results of the potential effects of high dose vitamins B in PD are encouraging, their safety in the long-run warrants further investigation. There is some concern that combining vitamins B at high dosages or taking some vitamins B at high dosages may be associated with adverse effects, including cancer.
Combined intakes of vitamins B We report below some studies about the association of combined intakes of vitamins B (B6 + B12; Folate + B6 + B12) with adverse effects.
An association was found of combined high intakes of vitamins B6 and Vitamin B12 with risk of hip fracture among postmenopausal women (Meyer, 2019). “Risk was highest in women with a combined high intake of both vitamins (Vitamin B6 ≥35 mg/d and Vitamin B12 ≥20 µg/d).” The risk was about 50% higher than with a lower intake of both vitamins (Vitamin B6 <2 mg/d and Vitamin B12 <10 µg/d)(Meyer, 2019).
Combined supplementation of folic acid and vitamin B12 was found to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. The study aimed at assessing the effect of daily supplementation for 2-3 years of folic acid (400 μg) and vitamin B12 (500 μg) versus placebo on fracture incidence. The researchers looked also at the long-term effects of combined supplementation of folic acid and vitamin B12 on the risk of cancer. A total of 2,524 participants were included. Participants receiving folic acid plus vitamin B12 had a higher risk of overall cancer (13.6% vs. 11.3%) and of colorectal cancer (3.4% vs. 2.0%) (Araghi, 2019).
Another study involved 636 patients who had undergone coronary stenting. They were randomly assigned to receiving folic acid, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12, as follows: 1 mg of folic acid, 5 mg of vitamin B6 and 1 mg of vitamin B12 intravenously, followed by daily oral doses of 1.2 mg of folic acid, 48 mg of vitamin B6, and 60 mcg of vitamin B12 for six months, or placebo. The restenosis rate was higher in the folate group than in the placebo group (34.5% vs. 26.5%). Also the percentage of patients who needed repeated target-vessel revascularization was higher in the folate group (15.8% vs. 10.6%). The researchers concluded that taking folate, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 after coronary stent may increase the risk of occlusion of the stent with a need for emergency revascularization (Lange, 2004)
In Norway, 6837 patients with ischemic heart disease were treated with oral B vitamins or placebo, as follows: a) folic acid (0.8 mg/d) plus vitamin B12 (0.4 mg/d) and vitamin B6 (40 mg/d); b) folic acid (0.8 mg/d) plus vitamin B12 (0.4 mg/d); c) vitamin B6 alone (40 mg/d); or d) placebo. Treatment with folic acid plus vitamin B12, but not treatment with vitamin B6, was associated with increased occurrence of (lung) cancer and cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease (Ebbing, 2009).
The Vitamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) cohort looked at supplement use of vitamins B6, folate, and B12 in 77,118 participants, aged 50 to 76 years, in relation to cancer risk. A significant risk was found in men for B6 and B12, especially smokers, but not in women. More specifically, the use of vitamin B6 and B12 from individual supplement sources, but not from multivitamins, was associated with a 30% to 40% increase in lung cancer risk among men, but not women. When the 10-year average supplement dose was considered, men taking > 20 mg/d of vitamin B6 and those taking > 55 µg/d of B12 had almost a two-fold increase in lung cancer risk compared with non-users. The risk was even higher among smokers (Brasky, 2017).
Vitamin B12 alone So far, vitamin B12 has been considered to be very safe, even at high dosage. No UL (Upper Tolerable Intake Limit) has been set as no adverse effects at high dosages have been reported.
However, studies, mostly observational, which have specifically looked at cancer risk associated with the intake of vitamin B12 - whether from food sources or from supplements - have found a positive association of vitamin B12 with lung cancer risk.
In a prospective cohort study (Singapore Chinese Health Study), 63 257 persons were followed up for incidence of lung cancer for up to 25 years. Higher intake of dietary vitamin B12 (i.e. from food sources) and high levels of vitamin B12 were associated with a significant increase risk in lung cancer, more in men than women. The authors concluded that the results of the study “highlights the potential harmful effect of vitamin B12 supplementation for lung cancer.” (Luu, 2021).
As seen in the VITAL study, a risk for cancer has recently been described in people having elevated levels of vitamin B12, to the extent that it has been proposed that unexplained elevated B12 levels should be evaluated as a possible marker of solid cancer (Urbanski, 2020).
Two retrospective cohort studies based on health registries have shown an association between elevated B12 levels and newly-diagnosed solid cancer.
A cohort study using population-based Danish medical registries of 333,667 subjects referred for plasma vitamin B12, found that high levels of B12, especially > 800 pmol/L (1084 ng/L), were associated with the risk of receiving a diagnosis of cancer, mostly within the first year of follow-up (Arendt, 2013)
Another population-based study on 757,185 persons in UK Primary Care found an association of high levels of B12 (>1,000 pmol/L) with the occurrence of a cancer within one year after the assay. The association was dose-dependent (Arendt, 2019).
Another study on blood samples from over 5000 case–control pairsfound a dose-dependent association of high levels of B12 with the risk for lung cancer, in both men and women. The authors concluded that their findings “support the hypothesis that high vitamin B12 status increases the risk of lung cancer.” (Fanidi, 2019).
785 patients with B12 ≥ 1000 ng/L were compared with 785 controls with B12 < 1000 ng/L in another study. A level of B12 ≥ 1000 ng/L was associated with the presence of solid cancer, particularly pancreas, colon/rectum, lungs, prostate, urothelium, and bone, and liver metastases. The association was stronger with increasing B12 levels, in particular in cases of metastases (Urbanski, 2020).
Lacombe and colleagues found that an elevated plasma B12 level (≥ 1000 ng/mL) persisting at the second measurement was strongly associated with the occurrence of solid cancer, compared with non-persistent plasma B12 elevation (Lacombe, 2021).
It should be noted that most of these studies are observational. This means that, while describing an association of vitamin B12 levels (predictor) and cancer (observed outcome), they do not establish a cause-effect relationship, unlike randomized trials.
A recent review has concluded that there is insufficient evidence to assume that high plasma vitamin B12, high B12 intake, or treatment with pharmacological doses of vitamin B12, is causally related to cancer (Obeid, 2022)
Folic acid alone A risk for cancer has also been described for high-dosage folic acid supplementation.
In a meta-analysis of six large prospective folic acid-supplementation trials, Baggott and colleagues reported that cancer incidences were higher in the folic acid-supplemented groups than the non-folic acid-supplemented groups (Baggott, 2012). Participants received folic acid (mean dosage 1.3 mg) during a period of 3 to 8 years. Most of the studies included individual folic acid supplementation without vitamin B12.
To show how controversial this issue is, other studies reported no significant risk of folic acid supplementation for cancer.
Qin and colleagues carried out a meta-analysis of randomized trials and found no significant risk of folic acid supplementation (mean dosage 1.64 mg) on cancer (n = 49,406, 13 trials), colorectal cancer (n = 33,824, 7 trials), lung cancer (n = 31,864, five trials), other cancers, and total cancer mortality (n = 31,930, six trials) during a mean follow-up time of 5.3 years (Qin, 2013).
Vollset and colleagues also carried out a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials including 49,621 participants, comparing those on folic acid (mean dosage 4.7 mg) with those on placebo. They reported no significant effect on cancer incidence including colon cancer during the first 5 years of treatment (Vollset, 2013).
Another meta-analysis of 19 studies, including 12 randomized control trials, found no significant risk for cancer incidence for folic acid supplementation (0.4–1 mg) in treated subjects, compared with the control group, except for prostate cancer (Wien, 2013).
Despite these considerations and the fact that these studies have not been carried out specifically in PwP, the concern remains. High doses of vitamins B should be taken only when needed as prescribed by a physician, and people given high doses of vitamins B should be followed up closely. Further studies are warranted.